Blame the Driver, Not the Cellphone
-
-
slice.mit.edu
- 1
Filed Under
Recommended
![](/sites/default/files/slice/uploads/2012/09/MIT_CTU-300x200.jpg)
Bryan Reimer, UTC associate director, told The Boston Globe:The UTC group analyzed 108 Boston-area drivers in three age brackets (20s, 40s, and 60s). Before the test drive, each participant answered questions about cell phone use while driving, plus their driving habits and citation history, and were split in two categories: "frequent user" and "rare user.""The people who are more willing to frequently engage in cellphone use are higher-risk drivers, independent of the phone. It’s not just a subtle difference with those willing to pick up the phone. This is a big difference."
The 40-minute test drive was conducted in a souped-up Volvo SUV that contained an eye tracker, heart and skin monitors, on-board sensors, and outward-facing video cameras on the front and back of the car. Phone calls were not allowed during the ride, which was held on a section of Interstate 93 just north of Boston.
According to the study, frequent users—even when not on their cellphone—drove almost three miles per hour faster, switched lanes twice as often, spent more time in the far-left lane, and were prone to brake-slamming.
The UTC research indicates that frequent users are naturally aggressive drivers, with or without a cellphone. The study also recommends that less focus be paid to laws that ban cellphone use, and more focus put on training that discourages cellphone use and other bad habits.
The study, "Self-Reported and Observed Risky Driving Behaviors among Frequent and Infrequent Cell Phone Users," appears in an August 2012 issue of Accident Analysis & Prevention.
Who’s to blame in erratic driving—man or machine? Let us know in the comments below or on Facebook.
Comments
Andy
Thu, 09/06/2012 4:30pm
I don't understand why people risk their life for such things. If you want to use your cell phone, if it is so important, it just takes few minutes to pull over and use your cell.