An MIT Alumni Association Publication

Grad Life: Good Ideas Don't Grow On Trees, So Where Do You Get Them?

  • Jacqueline M. Kory Westlund, Media Arts and Sciences
  • slice.mit.edu

Filed Under

Even at MIT, good ideas don't grow on trees.

Instead, I've found that good ideas have two ingredients: preparation and practice.

1. Preparation. The act of acquiring new knowledge and ideas. The foundation on which my good ideas will be built.

2. Practice. Generate lots of ideas. Engage with ideas in new ways. Think about what's next, what could be changed, what can be improved, how things work, what might happen if, implications, extrapolations.

Here's my method.

Preparation:

I read outside my field, especially non-fiction. This gives me new information and new perspectives.

""
Jackie and Tega, a robot platform designed to aid in early literacy.

For example, I read Cal Newport's Deep Work, which changed how I approach my work time. Peter Gray's book on self-directed education, Free to Learn, discussed education research about how children learn (including anthropology work about hunter-gatherer tribes!), which influenced how I approach my research on kids, robots, and learning. I've read books on creativity, laughter, the differences between ancient Chinese and Western medicine, the impact of socioeconomic status and race on language and society, the psychophysiology of stress, and many more.

I read papers in my field. I read the "future work" sections in papers I like. These sections are full of researchers' ideas that didn't make it into the current project, ways to extend their work, and ways to improve their work.

I have a regular academic reading group. Right now, I'm in a group organized around the broad topic of learning; we've read papers recently on the connections between Piaget and Vygotsky, Bandura's intrinsic motivation theory, and how stress affects learning. We take turns choosing papers, which means I often read papers I may not otherwise have picked up. One question I always try to ask is "How could I apply the ideas in this paper to my work?" What can I learn from this paper? Having this question in mind helps ground what I'm reading in what I already know.

Practice:

Notebooks: I have one. Several, actually (along with some text files and unsent email drafts). I jot down thoughts, ideas, and observations regularly. When I review these notes, I look for patterns. Through this, I've developed new research ideas and ways to build on previous work.

Spend time thinking, processing, summarizing, planning, and synthesizing. For me, this often overlaps with "notebook time", in that I do a lot of this thinking and planning on paper. I find writing time (such as working on a paper) is also synthesizing time. The process of writing coherent paragraphs about a topic means I'm clarifying and summarizing my understanding of the topic at the same time. The important thing, however you do it, is to not only accumulate knowledge but also process what you've learned. Connect ideas. Deepen your understanding of how different pieces of knowledge fit together.

Use class projects as an opportunity to explore random ideas. I've benefited from the MIT Media Lab's project-heavy class structure, since there's ample space to try out new things, no long-term vision or research agenda required. In my final project for an Affective Computing class, I tested a hypothesis about the impact of introducing a social robot in a particular way on people's social judgments of the robot. I've also made light-up balls that change color in response to accelerometer data (we called them glorbs), and created life-size paper robot silhouettes to ask questions about the "aliveness" of robots.

I talk to people. For example, in my lab group, we used to frequently throw ideas off the wall for half an hour over tea and coffee. We discussed serious stuff, like the ethics of child-robot interaction, as well as random stuff, like ceiling robots that could unobtrusively steal leftover food from other people's meetings. I try to talk to people from outside my lab and outside my field. Hearing from people who see things from a different perspective or who need me to explain things in a different way can be incredibly helpful for gaining new insights and seeing things from a different point of view.

In all these conversations, notebooks, and classes, I try to keep asking, "And then what?" If my hypotheses are supported, what next? If I'm wrong about something, what are the implications? Where are the opportunities? What might happen if?

That's where my good ideas come from. Preparation and practice.

Grad Life blog posts offer insights from current MIT graduate students twice a month on Slice of MIT.

This post originally appeared on the MIT Graduate Admissions student blogs

Filed Under

Next Up

  • Previous Article

    RNA Approach Advances CRISPR Gene Editing

    Leda Zimmerman, MIT Spectrum

    slice.mit.edu
    The Zhang lab’s RNA approach advances treatment options and avoids the cancer hazards associated with DNA editing.
  • Next Article

    2018 Tech Challenge Games


    The Bonny Kellermann ’72 and Robert Ferrara ’67 Tech Challenge Games are the most interesting and eclectic collection of MIT-inspired games you will ever encounter. Founded by alumni for alumni, the Games have become an integral and exciting part of reunion weekend.

    A special thanks to David Bragdon ’62 and Dominick Reuter for the wonderful photos.