Obama at MIT: Watch the Energy Address Webcast
-
-
slice.mit.edu
- 35
Filed Under
“Energy supplies are growing scarcer and energy demands are grown larger and rising energy use imperils the planet,” Obama told the MIT audience. “The world is engaged in peaceful competition to determine the technologies that will power the 21st century....The nation that wins this competition will lead the global economy—and I want America to be that nation.”
Naturally the campus was in a flurry—with secret service and parking chaos and a tremendous excitement about the presidential visit. However, this not the first time Obama has recognized MIT’s energy leadership. President Susan Hockfield stood alongside the President at a March press conference in DC where he announced stimulus bill funding for new energy technology and energy efficiency of $39 billion overall, including $6.5 billion for R&D.
MIT, of course, is a hotbed of energy research these days. Research and education focused through the MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI) is revolutionizing the generation, storage, and use of energy, from technologies that turn windows into highly efficient, cost-effective solar cells to quantum dot light bulbs with five times the efficiency of incandescent ones. MIT is also framing the national energy debate with seminal reports to Congress on the future of coal, geothermal, and nuclear power, as well as cap-and-trade policy. And the MIT Energy Conference – launched and run by the 1,700 members of our student-led Energy Club – ranks as one of the nation’s premier energy events.
View a slideshow of images shot on campus during the morning of Obama's talk:
[vodpod id=Groupvideo.3719302&w=425&h=350&fv=offsite%3Dtrue%26lang%3Den-us%26flickr_notracking%3Dtrue%26flickr_target%3D_self%26nsid%3D43876365%40N05%26textV%3D66488%26ispro%3D0%26%26set_id%3D72157622646363880%26page_show_back_url%3D%252Fphotos%252F43876365%2540N05%252Fsets%252F72157622646363880%252F%26page_show_url%3D%252Fphotos%252F43876365%2540N05%252Fsets%252F72157622646363880%252Fshow%252F%26minH%3D100%26minW%3D100]
Comments
Brave Dot
Sat, 10/24/2009 9:29am
Let me take a wild guess... Professor Lindzen was not invited to this event. Somehow, dissent is no longer the highest form of patriotism.
G.Michel
Thu, 10/29/2009 1:36pm
Why is there no mention of the Williston Basin referred to as the BAKKEN? Using existing technology there is enough fossil fuel to power this country for the next 2000 years. Just think what new technology could produce. Check it out at http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911.
I am disappointed in MIT being used as a political forum. Lets face it, that was all that it was.
Steven Greenberg
Thu, 10/29/2009 10:47am
William F. Steagall, did you major in creative writing at MIT? You certainly couldn't have been educated in one of the hard sciences.
Maybe your powers of observation have atrophied over the years since you graduated.
I certainly wouldn't hire you to do any engineering for me. Your inability to see the plain facts in front of your face would disqualify you for anything but a marketing job.
L. Gerber
Fri, 10/23/2009 5:50pm
I wonder what the MIT professors who don't agree with the Religion of Global Warming thought of his speech.... were they even invited? ...would love to hear from them.
Why isn't anyone seriously talking about nuclear energy?
Alvin D. Martin
Fri, 10/23/2009 2:11pm
I'd like to see MIT's efforts on the recovery of natural gas from shale highlighted. Please advise how you will accomplish this.
MIT alum
Sat, 10/24/2009 11:45pm
Wow, skepticism abound in these comments. I can be as skeptical as anyone... but really guys, this was a tremendously inspirational speech! Yeah, so not every MIT student could go, but at least every MIT student could hear the extraordinary praise and challenge from President Obama to improve today's energy situation.
Here're a few resources to get more info:
Video of speech - http://amps-web.mit.edu/public/amps/webcast/2009/obama-2009oct23/ondemand.html
Transcript of speech - http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/us/politics/24obama.text.html?pagewanted=all
MIT student coverage (including info on how the tickets were doled out) - http://tech.mit.edu/V129/PDF/N47.pdf
Steven Greenberg
Fri, 10/23/2009 12:08pm
Where is the video? Firefox is just showing me a static page. Internet Explorer tells me there is a bug in the code of the page.
http://amps-web.mit.edu/public/amps/webcast/2009/obama-2009oct23/
The speech will be over before the browser shows me anything.
alden
Fri, 01/17/2014 7:11am
Hi there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team
of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in
the same niche. Your blog provided us beneficial information to
work on. You have done a extraordinary job!
David Drummond
Fri, 10/23/2009 3:16pm
Access to Kresge was "extremely limited" and by special invitation only -- no doubt restricted to those of the proper political persuasian. This is sad. I remember the days when MIT believed in open debate. The event included several hymns to the Religion of Global Warming and, although I didn't watch the entire video, I'm pretty sure that inconvenient Science was not allowed to intervene in the festivities. It is also sad that MIT is being used in this way.
David Drummond
Sun, 11/01/2009 1:44am
You have it exactly right, Brave Dot.
David Drummond
Fri, 10/30/2009 1:45am
There's that old ad hominem again...
What are these "plain facts in front of your face"? Why are your comments all written in code? (And what is wrong with marketing???)
nancyds
Thu, 10/29/2009 11:14am
MIT has is on top of nuclear energy too. Here's a recent major policy report: http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower/
And the MITEI site has other research and major reports on clean coal etc. Here's the MITEI site: http://web.mit.edu/mitei/index.html
David Drummond
Mon, 10/26/2009 11:11pm
Exactly -- where is nuclear energy -- and offshore drilling -- and clean coal? Hearing from those who have alternative views?? what a radical concept!!
L. Gerber
Fri, 10/23/2009 5:41pm
You could have turned on CNN and seen it almost live -just a 2 second delay!
David Drummond
Sat, 10/31/2009 4:15pm
Thank you for that link! That is exciting -- much more so than an Obama speech at MIT. Energy policy should focus on developing technologies to exploit known resources like this one ... and keeping the Greens out of the way.
nancyds
Thu, 10/29/2009 11:09am
Technology Review's cover story for November is about this topic! What timing.
Lenny
Thu, 10/29/2009 1:26am
Who cares about the speech. Here is an administration that has already done more and will do more to KILL the entrepreneurial spirit. So MIT trades its soul for a few $. It's absolutely ridiculous. I am coming up to a major reunion and I can tell you that this appearance by the charlaton masquerading as president and using our alma mater as a platform for his ridiculous showcasing is causing me to, for the first time in many decades, terminate my pledge and donations to MIT. President Hochberg can make up the difference with an Obama-check.
patrick o'heffernan
Thu, 10/29/2009 1:33pm
As an MIT graduate, I am proud and excited Obama was at MIT. As the co-host of The Fairness Doctrine on WDIS-AM, Norfolk/Boston, it gives me and my coservative co-host, Chuck Morse, a nice local event to mix in with our commentary about national politics.
Dr. Patrick O'Heffernan
nancyds
Thu, 10/29/2009 1:09pm
Here's the Obama visit from a student's point of view...from the Admissions blogs.
http://www.mitadmissions.org/topics/misc/miscellaneous/if_the_obama_were_a_unit_of_me.shtml
Leon SE84
Thu, 10/29/2009 1:09pm
SAVE ENERGY instead of wasting it.
I feel inspired to think also small things may help, like create a PC OS system to find out what parts of a operating system are necessary. You will find out, only a fraction is needed for the day to day business. Find at MIT a way to reduce Windows7 to that, built adequade PCs and save some 100 Nukes wordwide.
jim bier
Wed, 10/28/2009 9:36pm
I want to see the beef in the federal policy that is going to make the U.S. a leader in renewable energy. Just saying it isn't enough. We've had enough of that approach in the last 9 years. It's too bad the Nobel Peace Prize Committee jumped on the bandwagon to affirm the illusion of progressive change through atmospherics.
William F. Steagall
Wed, 10/28/2009 5:47pm
Moderation? Does that mean checking for PC?
William F. Steagall
Wed, 10/28/2009 5:46pm
I am disappointed to see MIT used by this communist who holds the office of president.
Walt Brewer
Sun, 10/25/2009 3:08pm
Repeat: An A+ to the President for encouraging innovation and its long term consequenses to continue technology and economic leadership. Hopefully there will be enough risk capital in the private sector. However USA green energy efforts short term will increase the cost of our goods in an intense global commpetition. Thus we need an international "level playing field" to improve the global environment agreed by all concerned. Very little was said about efficient USE of energy. Urban transportation in particular is a neglected wide open field for innovation at the systems level. We are still tinkering with dressed up 100+ year old mass transit concepts which under real conditions do little if any to save energy. Automobile improvements are welcome, but where are the roads to relive stifling congestion? A truly new look is needed, probaly in the direction of automated personal systems on efficient narrow electrified guideways. How can MIT help?
wulfmankarl
Sat, 10/24/2009 2:18pm
Funny - Dead Economist Adam Smith Rants About Obama’s Energy Speech at MIT
http://02e56fa.netsolhost.com/blog1/index.php/2009/10/24/adam-smith-rants-about-obama-s-energy-sp
Malcolm Brown
Fri, 10/23/2009 11:17pm
There was little talk of global warming, which is OK. His key point is we are running out of fossil energy quickly and better find an alternative, or else. (what can't go on forever, won't, etc...) Since energy supplies are limited, we must conserve, or in other words, be more efficient. We have to reduce our energy consumption per capita by 25% to maybe over 50%. MIT could contribute tremendously in this area. There should have been more said.
Larry Sher
Fri, 10/23/2009 10:18pm
I agree that the visit will be another politically correct, one-sided group grope about anthrocentric causes of global warming. It would be nice to have an address by someone holding another view. I don't recall George W. Bush invited to the campus when he was president.
Steven Greenberg
Fri, 10/23/2009 7:31pm
David,
I didn't realize that telling you that MIT is run like a business and that a business doesn't slap around a major customer was my way of promoting left wing concepts.
Telling you to give up childish idealism is an ad hominem attack?
Maybe your problem is not knowing right from left. Or is that ad hominem, too?
R S Agullo
Fri, 10/23/2009 4:03pm
LOL Three-plus hours and my comment is still "awaiting moderation". Guess I'm not sufficiently moderate.
David Drummond
Fri, 10/23/2009 3:33pm
Ah yes, ad hominem, the favorite refuge of the Left.
I agree with you completely, by the way, that MIT will be handsomely rewarded for being used.
Steven Greenberg
Fri, 10/23/2009 3:21pm
David,
I am sure MIT is sad that it is being used as a repository for millions of dollars in federal research funding. How are they ever going to dispose or recycle so much paper?
You think MIT got all those past DARPA funds by biting the hand that fed it?
I guess you didn't take the course 29.1 Growing Up.
Steven Greenberg
Fri, 10/23/2009 1:11pm
Finally a President who can appreciate and share in the excitement of the research and education going on at MIT.
Steven Greenberg
Fri, 10/23/2009 12:12pm
Well, it is slowly getting fixed. I can now at least get something in the Windows Media view although the flash was not working last time I tried.
Miguel Chacon
Fri, 10/23/2009 11:23am
I am so happy to see follow up to all too important energy issues that we are having. And what better place than MIT to make a statement. I hope that we can all do our part as faculty, students, alumni or staff to follow up on any challenges or efforts that come from this.
R S Agullo
Fri, 10/23/2009 11:13am
Oh, WOW. LOL