Did you see Jeffrey Lin’s video tutorial on how to navigate the MIT Alumni Directory?

MIT’s Class of 2013 should find it useful next month as they earn their official listing in it, and the thousands of alumni who haven’t yet logged in to the Infinite Connection should check it out as well. You know who you are.Jeffrey Lin shot

Lin didn’t just make the video for the $300 gift card prize offering in the MIT Alumni Association contest. An avid designer, Lin enjoys fooling with film technologies and says he made this video on the night before deadline.

“I saw the listing and figured I had a shot,” he said. “And I thought, ‘what better way to do this quickly than with animation?’ I grabbed a Wacom tablet, which you can hook to your laptop and use for drawing by hand. I used QuickTime screen capturing.”

A big fan of RSA Animate, Lin designed the directory tutorial with its instructional, straightforward style in mind, telling the story of a login through clever animated slides.

“I hadn’t really done something like it before and wanted to see how it would work out,” he recalled.

Whether experimenting with live-action or animation, Lin enjoys storytelling. His short documentary on the MIT lightweight crew team and his moving profile of Emma Nelson ’14 demonstrate his attention to a film’s narrative arc.

Though Lin is a course 4 (architecture) major, he has enjoyed Professor Vivek Bald’s documentary filmmaking course and Angel Nevarez’s intro to video class. In the latter, Lin directed A Proper Meal, which won the undergraduate CMS Media Spectacle Award last year.

Lin has also been active in the Asian American Association and the DynaMIT engineering camp, where he mentors middle school-aged students in math and science.

Whether Lin pursues film or architecture or design or none of the above, he clearly knows how to use the alumni directory for reaching out to fellow beavers. During IAP in 2011, he interned at the Brand Union in New York, working under its North American CEO Robert Scalea ’77, an experience he chronicled on Slice.

{ 0 comments }

A group of buyers and sellers negotiate the price of Gouda cheese around a trailer loaded with cheese in Gouda, The Netherlands (© Owen Franken).A group of buyers and sellers negotiate the price of Gouda cheese around a trailer loaded with cheese in Gouda, The Netherlands (© Owen Franken).

Curious about Owen Franken? View more of his work via the Franken Photo of the Week category, learn more in this profile, read a What Matters opinion column he wrote called “Life in Brownian Motion,” or visit his website.

{ 0 comments }

Tony Stark, class of 1987 (maybe), proudly sporting his Brass Rat.

Tony Stark, class of 1987 (maybe), proudly sporting his Brass Rat.

It’s been established that Tony Stark is MIT’s greatest (fictional) alumnus. In fact, Stark can be seen wearing his Brass Rat in multiple scenes in the first Iron Man movie. The film’s director, Jon Favreau, once said of Stark, “He’s somebody who created a suit using his own intelligence and sweat of his brow. I would love for that to make being an engineer cool—that  people might want to go to MIT instead of being on MTV.”

A proud affiliation notwithstanding, little is known about Stark’s time at MIT. His academic record is sealed and existing public information is inconsistent. MIT Admissions tentatively lists Stark as receiving his undergraduate degree in 1987 but Marvel Comics claims he received two master’s degrees in engineering by age 19. Confusing matters more, a LinkedIn profile for Tony Stark indicates he received doctorates in engineering physics and artificial intelligence.

These contradictory statements lead to one question: Just who was Tony Stark during his time at MIT?

Boston.com’s Radio BDC blog helped answer this question earlier this week. In honor of the release of the third Iron Man film, the blog tracked down real-life Bostonians—including one former MIT director—who shared their encounters with a young Stark during the mid-80s.

A sample of the memories includes:

  • “I saw him a few times at the chess boards near Au Bon Pain in Harvard Square. There was this guy down there, a chess master, and you could give him five or ten bucks and he’d play you a game. A couple of times I remember [Tony] breezing in and throwing money on the table, and kind of wiping the floor with the guy.”
  • “No one really knew him, he was just a rich kid. Everyone wanted him around, though, because he’d always bring something fun for the party.”
  • “I remember him at after-parties on Thayer Street. He was up later than anyone else. But you could always get a ride home with him, because he always had a car.”

Perhaps the most poignant recollection comes from Henry Jenkins, the former co-director of MIT’s Comparative Media Studies.

From “Bostonians sharing their memories of MIT class of ’87 grad Tony Stark:”

“Some students are larger than life—they leave a trace across the entire campus, and people talk about them well after they have left the building, so to speak. Stark was one of those people.”

“And don’t get me started about the hacks that have been ascribed to Stark through the years. I have heard all kinds of claims about what Stark put on the Great Dome to the ways he rewired the elevators in the Green Building. They can’t all be true, can they?”

Read more about Tony Stark’s (fictional) time at MIT on the Radio BDC blog. Thanks to Harbo Jensen PhD ’74 for contributing to this story.

{ 4 comments }

My doctor told me recently to stop running. He said my knees, like most human knees, have had enough of high-impact exercise after twenty years of road races.

He’s the third doctor to tell me so. Maybe this time it will sink in. In a small, perhaps completely incomparable way, I’ve felt the same zeal to overcome the body’s limitations that those who have endured paralysis, severe arthritis, or amputations experience. We all have that need to mend, overcome the pain, and return to the challenge.

Hugh Herr SM '93. Photo: Webb Chappell.

Hugh Herr SM ’93. Photo: Webb Chappell.

So when I heard interviews with victims of the Boston Marathon bombing in the past few weeks, who, despite severe injury and amputation, vowed to run the race again, I nodded my head. I understood.

MIT Media Lab Associate Professor Hugh Herr SM ’93 heard the same declarations coming from bombing victims this month. He, too, understood.

But Herr, himself a double amputee, is in a unique place to help. Partnering with No Barriers USA, Herr and his Biomechatronics Research Group intend to support any marathoner who, despite severe injury or limb loss as a result of the bombings, aims to run again next year.

No Barriers, a nationwide nonprofit with a goal of improving lives through assistive technology, launched the No Barriers for Boston fund on April 26. It hopes to raise $500,000 to support investments in sport-specific prosthetic limbs to help survivors run, bike, swim, or otherwise compete athletically again.

“Assistive technology makes a profound impact on the lives of people struggling with physical disability,” Herr wrote in a May 3 post on a Wall Street Journal blog. “It created a passion in me for science and engineering that has since defined my career.”

Herr’s award-winning team focuses on creating “intimate extensions of the human body” that react with ease to the nervous system’s electromechanical commands as fluidly as natural limbs. With fourteen patents relating to the field of bionics, Herr hopes to make an array of such advanced prosthetics commercially available and affordable.

What about knees like mine? In a New York Times interview last week, Herr speculated that someday, “smart” pants that act like a second skin on one’s legs might make running a painless, lifelong pursuit.  My joints like the sound of that.

An avid athlete himself, Herr says he intends to run alongside his fellow amputees in next year’s Boston Marathon.

“We will participate as a beautifully defiant statement to the world that we the people will not be intimidated, brought down, diminished, conquered or stopped by acts of violence,” he writes.

{ 0 comments }

Update: View a video of this presentation.

The human brain is, perhaps, the most complex organism to have evolved on this planet. Thinking about the brain raises a broad array of questions: what is the mind, what is intelligence, how does the brain discover order from complex sensory inputs, and so on.

In the next Faculty Forum Online broadcast, Professor James DiCarlo, head of MIT’s Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, will comment on the department’s pioneering work. DiCarlo, an investigator at the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MIT, will introduce his current research and take live questions from the worldwide MIT community on Wednesday, May 15, from noon to 12:30 p.m. (EDT).

Register for this free event—New Research on the Brain—to receive the link for live viewing. After the event, return to Slice and continue the conversation in the comments.

Professor James DiCarlo

Professor James DiCarlo

About James DiCarlo

James DiCarlo examines the complex network of brain regions that allows one to recognize vast numbers of objects rapidly and effortlessly. DiCarlo also develops computational models of the brain with the ultimate goal of building a computer simulation of the brain’s capacity that could provide insights into the sensory deficits that occur after stroke or brain injury.

His lab seeks to understand the mechanisms underlying visual object recognition—specifically how sensory input is transformed by the brain from an initial representation (essentially a photograph on the retina) to a more powerful representation that can allow the brain to solve the computationally difficult problem of object recognition.

DiCarlo joined the McGovern Institute in 2002. He received his bachelor’s degree from Northwestern University, his doctoral degrees from Johns Hopkins University, and did postdoctoral work at Baylor College of Medicine. He is a past recipient of John Hopkins’ Martin and Carol Macht Young Investigator Research Prize, the Alfred P. Sloan Research fellowship, and the McKnight Foundation’s Neuroscience Scholar Award.

RELATED

Video: Meet James DiCarlo, from MIT TechTV
James DiCarlo to head Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, from MIT News
McGovern Institute Profile: James DiCarlo

{ 5 comments }

Guest Blogger: Peter Dunn

coal, before and after it's been in the forge

Mike Tarkanian holds a lump of bituminous blacksmithing coal (right) and a lump of coke (left). Coke is coal reduced to nearly pure carbon after all the volatile compounds have been burned off in the forge. Photos: Peter Dunn.

Mike Tarkanian ’00, SM ’03, a lecturer in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, is a friendly bearded man with a shaved head and the stout hands of a smith. He honors an ancient practice, standing in a basement room in Building 4, surrounded by anvils, cabinets full of hammers and tongs, a coal bin, and the three barbeque-grill-sized forges that he oversees.

“There’s something about heating things up and smashing them with a hammer that’s universally appealing,” he adds.

That clearly holds true at the Institute, where hundreds of students apply annually for 54 openings in Tarkanian’s IAP class in blacksmithing, and dozens of MSE students work at the forges every semester as part of their Materials Laboratory (3.014) and Materials in the Human Experience (3.094) classes. Tarkanian and MSE Professor Sam Allen also offer a Freshman Advisor Seminar to about a half-dozen incoming students each year.

at the forge

A wide variety of tongs, like the ones being shown by Mike Tarkanian, is essential equipment for any blacksmith. Tongs are often fabricated by the smith for a particular project.

On one level, working at a forge provides deeper comprehension of things like the effects of carbon content on steel or the difficulties of making alloys. But more broadly, says Tarkanian, “craft-based, history-based teaching gives engineers a human connection and a social context.”

Moreover, adds Tarkanian, who discovered the forges as a freshman working with his predecessor, Toby Bashaw, the experience provides important insights for engineering management, especially in manufacturing. “A student who graduates and becomes a boss is much better off if they’ve made things—whether it’s forging or machining or 3-D printing. You need to know the possibilities and the pitfalls, the importance of sequencing, the details that make something look professional. If you don’t, you won’t be effective and you can look foolish.”

Currently, MIT’s forges share space with the MIT Glass Lab. A proposed renovation would incorporate a room across the hall for an expanded metalworking facility and give the Glass Lab the entirety of room 4-003.

While the bigger space might incorporate some gas-fired forges and pneumatic hammers, Tarkanian says basic forges, not unlike those of 6,000 years ago, will remain the program’s centerpiece. “Managing a coal fire and using traditional tools helps people learn the craft better,” he says.

“Today a lot of people are asking, what’s the role of residence-based education,” notes Tarkanian. “Well, it’s stuff like this—you can’t hammer steel through your computer.”

{ 1 comment }

Over 75% of Americans live in urban areas, a number that has risen steadily in the past century.

Ensuring that cities are comfortable places to live for those growing numbers is tough. How best to house everyone? Get them to commute in eco-friendly ways? Provide families and children with fresh, healthy food?

Julie Lein GM '12. Photo: Sloan Women in Management.

Julie Lein GM ’12. Photo: Sloan Women in Management.

Doing so—on a large scale—requires creative thinking and smart solutions. Two MIT Sloan alumnae, Clara Brenner GM ’12 and Julie Lein GM ’12, aim to fund such thinking with a new startup based in San Francisco.

Tumml, which launched this spring and which comes from a Yiddish word for “shaking things up,” arose out of a study the two women did while at Sloan. After surveying startups nationwide, they found that a mere 15% of those that focused on urban problems got seed funding.

Brenner and Lein think of Tumml as an “urban impact accelerator.” Calling attention to that low result in the venture capital community, the two alums aim to foster creative entrepreneurs who are eager to make city living better. Brenner’s background in real-estate and alternative financing has combined well with Lein’s background in urban education and nonprofit advocacy in forming Tumml.

“At the same time that more people than ever are living in cities, the fiscal climate means that cities are less able to provide certain services and quality of life,” Lein said in an interview with VentureBeat. “Entrepreneurs can shoulder that load. There is such a market opportunity here. This is where entrepreneurship should enter, there is so much they could do. We were curious why more entrepreneurs are not stepping up to fill the gap.”

Tumml’s first project will be hosting ten “promising, for-profit companies” to work in their San Francisco office, appropriately named The Hatchery. Each for-profit selected for the 12-week residency will receive $30,000 in free services along with office space as they conceive of and launch their solution.

At the end of each cohort, Tumml will work with startups to pitch their projects to investors, potential clients, or government agencies.

“There is not necessarily a place for entrepreneurs to go right now when they want to solve a problem in their own backyard,” Lein said. “We want to be the place that addresses those needs, and create a meaningful pipeline of urban impact entrepreneurs to prove that these companies have the ability to succeed, and people have the ability to shape our cities in important ways.”

{ 0 comments }

A cactus in Mexico (© Owen Franken).A cactus in Mexico (© Owen Franken).

Curious about Owen Franken? View more of his work via the Franken Photo of the Week category, learn more in this profile, read a What Matters opinion column he wrote called “Life in Brownian Motion,” or visit his website.

{ 0 comments }

Guest Blogger: Debbie Levey, CEE Technical Writer

kortney adams sm 00

Kortney Adams SM ’00.

Kortney Adams SM ’00 transformed herself from environmental engineer to professional actor in the past decade, a process that has been at best a complicated one. Although she dabbled in drama in high school, Adams describes herself as “a classic engineering kid who took things apart and put them back together to see how they worked.”

As an engineering undergraduate at Washington University at St. Louis, Adams continued to act in her spare time. In her first job with an environmental consulting company, Adams traveled continuously to supervise hazardous waste cleanup sites. She no longer had time for theater, and that made her miss it more.

Coming to MIT to pursue graduate work, Adams assumed that her future professional responsibilities would likewise make acting impossible. She decided that it was “my last chance, so I was almost constantly in shows,” she says. “My advisor, Professor Trish Culligan, was very patient.”

“I have a special fondness for MIT because I feel like I found my art there,” says Adams. “I loved working with so many creative people and not feeling blocked out just because I was an engineer.”

Among her many memorable parts on campus: the title role in the MIT Shakespeare Ensemble’s production of Richard III.

After graduating with a master’s in engineering, the private sector beckoned but Adams demurred.

“I enjoyed consulting, but something else was calling me,” said Adams. While she felt that she could be perfectly content with environmental engineering, “I wanted to shoot for blissfully happy.”

Adams spent the next year working in a travel agency while figuring out what direction to take. “When 9/11 happened, suddenly the travel business tanked. Everyone reexamined what they were doing in their lives,” she remembered.

As a new year’s resolution that winter, Adams decided to become an actor.

Photo: Elizabeth Stewart.

Adams performing at the Central Square Theater. Photo: Elizabeth Stewart.

Other people who made a transition to acting after their MIT years gave Adams advice. These included Teresa Huang ’97, a script writer, producer and actress in Los Angeles. After a year, Adams accumulated enough jobs to quit her temporary job as bartender and has been a full-time actor ever since. Her credits include movies, commercials, plays, and other performances. Adams narrated Make Way For Ducklings with the Boston Landmarks Orchestra in 2003.

Clearly, her work has paid off. The Boston Globe praised Adams’s portrayal of a pregnant artist in From Orchids and Octopi, citing both her “warmth and intelligence” in her character’s “complex, changing, and utterly believable relationship with her husband.” Reviews for other roles described her as “classy and elegant” and complimented her “layered and intelligent performance.”

This spring, Adams will star in the Wheelock Family Theater’s production of Pippi Longstocking in Boston.

“One of my favorite things about being an actor is how much I learn that I wasn’t exposed to as a math and science kid,” Adams says. “I love getting to step into the shoes of all these different people and different cultures. Now I’ll get to learn about Pippi Longstocking and why kids love her.”

{ 0 comments }

Just a few blocks from where the Boston Marathon bombing suspects allegedly murdered an MIT police officer, a panel of experts convened on May 1 for a conversation entitled Marathon Bombing: The Global Context.

Who is to blame for the intelligence gap between Russia and the United States before the bombing? Was the bombing an act of religious fundamentalism? Will this event make Boston into a more monitored city, like London, with cameras on every street corner? The panel explored these and other questions on Wednesday.

MIT Security Studies Program senior advisor Jeanne Guillemin discussing the marathon bombing.

MIT Security Studies Program senior advisor Jeanne Guillemin discussing the marathon bombing.

Moderated by Ford International Professor of Political Science and Center for International Studies director Richard Samuels, five MIT professors and scholars provided several contexts surrounding the bombers’ ideology and theorized about the policy impacts the bombing might have in the weeks, months, and years to come.

MIT history professor Elizabeth Wood best summed up the purpose of the Starr Forum talk.

“Unless we understand the perpetrators of violence as individuals situated in history, as individuals situated in causes that are larger than their own biographies, we cannot understand what happened last week at the Boston Marathon,” Wood said.

How much did being natives of the Caucasus region influence the Tsarnaev brothers? Wood and Carol Saivetz, a research affiliate at the MIT Security Studies Program, explored this question, describing the past century of Chechnya’s tensions with Russia, highlighting how the Tsarnaev family lived through each turbulent decade.

Saivetz’s slide, Tsarnaev Chronology: A Tale of Two Brothers, detailed the family’s moves throughout the region since 1944, when Stalin deported thousands of Chechens to work camps. The family’s move to Dhagestan in 2001, when the boys were eight and fifteen years old, was a result of the violence in the second Chechen War, Saivetz said.

Bakyt Beshimov, a visiting scholar at the Security Studies Program and a native of the Caucasus region, certainly links the Tsarnaevs’ mindset to their homeland.

Beshimov watched every video, read every internet post, and listened to every song that inspired Tamerlan Tsarnaev. “His inner search was, in my view, affected by the struggle in his own country, jihadism in the Caucasus and the global Islamic radical ideology,” said Beshimov. “This mindset puts many Chechens into a vicious circle of revenge.”

Several panelists conjectured that the bombing might justify crackdowns and human rights abuses in Russia, particularly ahead of the Winter Olympics in Sochi next year. Then there were the questions of what precedents the Boston response will set in cities around the globe.

CIS research associate and assistant professor at Boston College Peter Krause PhD ’11 mused, “Is a lockdown something we’re prepared to do again and again? What about domestic drones for national security or the government reading our email?”

“I’m not going to counsel one way or another on the [issue of] over- or under-reaction,” Krause said. “I’m confident about this: that understanding when and why these things happen is going to lead to better answers as a society…and I’m encouraged by the people who are here today.”

{ 1 comment }